Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bernd Helmle
Subject Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects
Date
Msg-id EC025E49CC0AB774A3205928@[192.168.1.119]
Whole thread Raw
In response to [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

--On 26. Juni 2009 13:08:37 +0900 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote:

>  * Is the named large object (including fully qualified one) worth?
>    It will enables us to specify a largeobject with human readable
>    identifier string.

I don't understand the notion of this. Does this mean you can create a LO 
with an identifier string, generated from (e.g.) your application?

-- 
Thanks
Bernd


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Join optimization for inheritance tables